Bury Council – more savings announced

by timpickstone on December 4, 2012

The Council has produced an update on the savings it proposes to make over the next two years. Because of a number of changes it now estimates that it needs to save an extra £8.7 Million, which is on top of the £17.7 million that was included in its current three year plan for savings.

The full copy of the paper is here, but there are a number of proposals that are worth highlighting:

By far the largest area of savings or cuts are to ‘Support for Vulnerable people’ - with these new announcements these savings almost triple to to nearly £4,000,000 – mostly this is care for older people, but also includes more cuts to Children’s Centres and home to school travel for children (over £1/2 million in total on the latter).

The popular Park Rangers service is being abolished altogether. I know many local people will have benefitted from the work of the Rangers – not least work around the Wetland in Simister.

Other savings include:
- Doing away with free 15 mins parking in the Town Centre, and doing away with free Sunday parking
- Cutting grants to charities by £120,000
- £820,000 of staff reductions (not filling vacant posts)
- £800,000 of changes in terms and conditions to staff (though it is not clear what)
- continued reduction in funding for basic services like street cleaning and repairs

It is easy to just ‘blame the Government’ but I think all of us appreciate that we live in difficult economic times and whichever Party(s) were in Government these sort of savings would need to be made. But local Councils do have choices about what savings they make.

My biggest concerns are:
(a) the very significant savings proposed to support to vulnerable people. The number of older people in Bury rises every year, and at present demand for care services from the council means that this budget is overspending by nearly £1 million. The Government has even provided Councils with extra cash to help with these pressures but now Bury is proposing to make £4 million in cuts which I believe is cruel.

(b) as local Council Tax payers we all deserve a good basic level of service. Ordinary services like street repair or cleaning, park maintenance, environmental health continue to be cut despite the fact that our roads and pavements are in an appalling state.

What would we do differently?
We believe that it is a shame that the Council has not looked seriously at how it could save money by providing some services jointly with other local councils. Every Council has to provide the same services and at the moment we’re all doing it separately. A few smaller items have been looked at, but nothing significant. We also believe that the Council should review its management structure. Broadly 25% of of discretionary spend is being proposed to be knocked off the budgets, but the Council still has the same number of ‘Directorates’ – each with their own management structure.

Let me know what you think?
Please do not hesitate to let me know what you think about the proposed Council cuts. I know a lot of people have already been in touch about the Park Ranger service which would be a terrible loss – but please let me know what you think.

Tim

Read more   2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. Howard Orgel says:

    Save as much money as possible within the town hall:
    Do away with separate chief excecutive and finance director posts. there is not enough work for the two persons currently in post. Do not pay “golden handshakes” to any senior personnel whose posts are ceased. Do away with most senior and middle managers. Very few senior and middle management pesonnel make a valuable (read profitable) contribution to the organisations for whom they work. Again, do not pay “golden handshakes” to those whose posts are ceased. Achieve greater productivity among those managers who remain by banning meetings. Meetings involving more than two persons are generally counter-productive. Since there will be fewer office staff, concentrate them into as few buildings as possible. Sell those buildings thus emptied for RESIDENTIAL development to avoid building on green belt land.

  2. Whistle Blower says:

    I have had some interesting but distrubing news today that certain members of managerial staff in the Chief Execs department are having pay rises this year when most people who work under management have had pay frozen, overtime cut and no pay rise whatsover this year or the past three years! How can this be justifiable?! Its clear that once again Council managers are lining their own pockets at the expense of low paid workers, they should be ashamed! Comment left December 29th 2012

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>